Reblog: 5 tips on charging for content from Alan Murray of WSJ.com
Monday, April 13th, 2009by CK Thurber
Last week, Robert Thomson, editor of the Wall Street Journal stated that companies aggregating mainstream media content without paying a fee are the “parasites or tech tapeworms in the intestines of the internet.” While not everyone at major news sites echo this sentiment, it is understandable to want revenue for original content and for others to not profit on infringing content.
Alan Murray, executive editor of The Wall Street Journal Online, and a good friend to OneSpot, came up with 5 tips on charging for content online. I recommend watching the interview and using the summary tips and commentary below the video as a cheat sheet for your own online business. Below are a few of our favorites:
“You can’t charge for exclusives that will just be repeated elsewhere.
“‘If it’s a big news story, if we report a takeover and — we could hold that behind the pay wall, but if we do, Business Week or someone else will simply write a story saying ‘The Wall Street Journal is reporting x,’ and they’ll get all the traffic. Why would we do that?’ So they drop the pay wall, ‘and take the traffic ourselves, thank you very much,’ Murray said.”
If you are reporting on a breaking news story, it is virtually impossible to be the exclusive online source for that content. Someone else will report on it, even if you have an “exclusive” deal. If you do not offer the story for free, someone else will and possibly for a lower quality than your original. So why not offer the best of the best and keep the traffic yourself?
“The key is not to take your most popular stuff and put it behind a pay wall… The broad, popular stuff is the stuff you want out in the free world because that drives traffic, that builds up your traffic, and you can, of course, serve advertising to that audience.”
Like I previously mentioned, if you provide the best of the best of the popular stories, then people will find your site. If your coverage is great, then people will come back to your site for other popular stories. There is brand preference for papers, even online. By making your popular content available for free, even if only initially until it is archived, people will find your story and likely stick around for more.
Stay tuned to this blog as we provide our take on the “Newspapers vs. Content Aggregators” feud and follow us on Twitter as we cover this topic and more every weekday.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Traditional Media Blasts Google (kylelacy.com)
- New York Times Considering a Return to Access Fees (npharder.wordpress.com)
- Rupert Murdoch’s Premium Content Flip Flop [Advertising] (gawker.com)
- OneSpot expands WSJ partnership (downloadsquad.com)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=91ed1775-3512-4430-bf34-08f1c0e63990)


